Amid the Coronavirus Outbreak, Are Municipal Bonds Still a Safe Haven Blog Banner

Amid the Coronavirus Outbreak, Are Municipal Bonds Still a Safe Haven?

03/05/2020

As volatility in the equity markets persists due to the expansion of the coronavirus outbreak, investors have turned to the safety of US Treasuries, driving yields lower. Despite the Federal Reserve making an emergency 50-basis-point rate cut on March 3, the biggest onetime rate cut since the financial crisis in 2008, there’s still a great deal of uncertainty around how the bond market will react. Bond yields remain very low, and markets don’t seem to have faith that the Fed has done enough. What does this mean for investors in municipal bonds? As I evaluate the muni landscape, I observe three key things.


Municipal bonds provide diversification, and they’re doing that now

Muni bonds are a valuable building block of investor portfolios due to their tax advantages, low historical default rates, and diversification benefits. They’ve thus far again exhibited negative correlation during the coronavirus outbreak, delivering a positive return as equities have plummeted. 


As a result, investors owning muni bonds likely have unrealized gains in their portfolios, so they should carefully consider any attempt to reposition their holdings. Realizing these gains, especially net of taxes, may not be prudent if the reinvestment goes back into a safe-haven asset class. 


For investors with long time horizons, it may be more advantageous to stay invested and focus on the book yield of existing holdings—the rate at which they’ve put their money to work. The generally higher book yields will continue to provide some cushion against higher rates while also providing the safe haven many investors still look for.


Lastly, with respect to new-money investments, patience may be appropriate, along with slowly taking advantage of more attractive entry points into the market. 



 

 

Amid the Coronavirus Outbreak, Are Municipal Bonds Still a Safe Haven Supporting graphic

Technical factors and retail sentiment may weigh on bond valuations

Once fear subsides, muni bond market technical factors may garner more attention. Historically, March and April see a resurgence of new-issue supply from lighter issuance at the start of the year. This may be particularly elevated this year as issuers take advantage of record-low yields. 


However, retail investors may begin to lose enthusiasm for the same reason, causing tax-exempt municipal bond funds to see accelerating outflows. While shifting safe-haven assets doesn’t make sense, if equity markets erode further, investors may reallocate to risk assets. All of this means that we’re likely to see some volatility in the muni bond market in the short to intermediate term. We view this as an opportunity.


How will the coronavirus outbreak affect individual municipal sectors?

One of the principal concerns of muni investors is credit quality. Depending on the direction the coronavirus outbreak takes, it has the potential to affect some issuers’ credit ratings. Let’s look at five muni sectors and how this could play out. 


Hospitals

If the coronavirus outbreak turns out to be similar to the typical seasonal flu, it could be modestly positive for hospitals. A bump in patient volumes could lead to revenue increases, assuming hospitals effectively minimize patients’ length of stay and commercially well-covered patients seen exceed those that are poorly covered or indigent. 

Credit concerns include the extent of impact derived from the following factors:


  • Cancellation or postponement of more-profitable elective procedures and diagnostics out of contagion fear
  • Disruption of the health-care-related supply chain and consequent scarcity of such items as pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, and protective gear
  • Higher unbudgeted wage costs related to overtime

Large-scale, well-capitalized health care systems are more insulated from these concerns than stand-alone academic medical centers, community providers, and rural hospitals with limited cash reserve cushions and weaker payer mixes.


Transit

With more companies imposing work-from-home mandates, public transit could be affected due to less commuter travel. Other types of trips could also decline, since people will have more incentive to shop online to avoid crowds. Keep in mind that on January 20, public transit was suspended in Wuhan, China, due to the outbreak.


Hotels

The US economy continues to be robust. However, an economic downturn stemming from the coronavirus outbreak could have a deep negative impact on hotels and convention centers. A potential decrease in room prices and occupancy levels could reduce net operating income and thus stress coverage of debt obligations. 


Airports 

In the initial wake of the coronavirus epidemic, some international travel has been curtailed and companies recently have reduced work travel domestically. Most airports rely not only on passenger enplanement levels but also on concession revenues. Agreements with airports also require air carriers to meet operating costs as related to their use. 


In general, larger airports with greater international travel and overall volume, such as LAX and JFK, continue to be supported with strong balance sheets and strong local markets. If auto traffic ebbs across the country longer term, airports reliant on customer facility charges from rental car companies could experience a downturn as demand falls.


By way of comparison, US airports during other crises (such as the SARS outbreak of 2002–2003, 9/11, and the global financial crisis) did experience sharp downturns in air traffic, but they didn’t experience the kind of financial distress that resulted in credit defaults. 


Port authorities

Chinese export volumes are expected to decline in the first quarter of 2020. The effect on US ports may hit shortly thereafter due to the time it takes to sail to the US, especially if there are extended factory closures leading to more shipping cancellations. However, US ports receive most of their revenues from fixed payments from tenants, which will mitigate the effects of short-term volume declines.


West Coast ports will likely be the most affected. The Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach have the most exposure to two-way trade with China. However, at least 70% of the revenue for both ports comes from minimum annual guarantees.


The bottom line

There continues to be a lot of uncertainty about the coronavirus outbreak—everything from how severe it will grow to be to the effectiveness of the monetary and fiscal response—and the epidemic is a fast-developing story. Because more volatility in risk-on asset classes may ensue, investors looking to their existing municipal bond holdings to provide a safe harbor in the storm should stay the course. For new investors, it may be wise to invest patiently, since the prospects of weaker market technicals may lead to better buying opportunities. Lastly, negative long-term trends may affect specific credits, reinforcing the need for professional due diligence in investors’ muni bond portfolios. 

Potential Parametric solution

Parametric provides simple, scalable SMA solutions designed to deliver industry-leading fixed income asset management, from navigating an uncertain interest rate environment to evaluating credit risk. As of December 31, 2019, the Parametric Fixed Income Investment Team manages over $45 billion in AUM across both laddered and managed fixed income portfolios.



Nisha Patel 

Nisha Patel, CFA, Director, Fixed Income Portfolio Management

Nisha is a municipal portfolio manager on Parametric’s Fixed Income Investment Team. She is responsible for buy and sell decisions, portfolio construction, and risk management for the firm’s tax-advantaged bond strategies group. She joined the firm in 2009 (originally as an employee of Parametric’s parent company, Eaton Vance). Prior to Eaton Vance, Nisha began her career in the investment management industry in 2006 as a portfolio manager with M.D. Sass. She was previously affiliated with Bloomberg. Nisha earned a BS in business administration from Boston University. She is a member of the New York Society of Security Analysts and is a CFA charterholder. She appears regularly on Bloomberg and CNBC to discuss municipal bonds, the Fed, and the US macro environment.


The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors and are current only through the date stated. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Parametric and its affiliates disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for Parametric are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Parametric strategy. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All investments are subject to the risk of loss.


{F33BD959-1499-4857-91FB-3B0EF4ADCB43}

Loading...