Continuing a trend of the past five years, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) grew in assets under management (AUM) in 2020. More investors are using ETFs as they shift from active to passive investing. One favored advantage of ETFs is tax efficiency due to the low turnover associated with index-based investments, in addition to many ETF providers’ use of the creation and redemption process to reduce capital gains distributions.
However, the fact remains that the ETF continues to be a one-size-fits-all solution that isn’t optimal for everyone. The flexibility of a custom passive separately managed account (SMA) can beat an ETF in terms of tax efficiency in many cases. Let’s look at a few examples.
Advantage #1: Tax-loss harvesting
A custom passive SMA is a superior vehicle for delivering the value of tax-loss harvesting. This value comes through realizing tax losses that can be used to offset capital gains. In a custom passive SMA holding many securities, loss-harvesting opportunities are more plentiful because each security is a potential loss-harvesting trade. Even when the market is up, investors can still find losses in a tax-managed portfolio. With ETFs, investors need to wait for the entire market to go down before they can harvest any losses.
Advantage #2: Transition of appreciated securities or concentrated positions
A custom passive SMA allows investors with existing stock portfolios to more effectively transition to an index-based exposure over time. A custom passive SMA manager can analyze an investor’s existing securities, decide which ones to keep, and carefully sell out of non-index names, using the proceeds to invest in securities that help reduce tracking error to the index. It’s important in transitions like this to take gains and losses into account, since the sale of each appreciated security can result in capital gains taxes. A custom passive SMA manager can use the losses embedded in the portfolio to offset any gains realized.
On the other hand, an ETF investor has a much harder time making a careful transition, because they don’t have the ability to work with the granularity of the individual stocks. Often they’re stuck with liquidating the portfolio and buying the ETF, which can trigger a large tax bill.