As investor expectations evolve, and tax awareness becomes more central to portfolio construction, active tax management has emerged as a defining feature of sophisticated investment strategies. Across both equities and fixed income, disciplined processes may help investors retain more of what they earn.
Tax management has rapidly evolved from a secondary consideration to a central pillar of portfolio construction. According to recent research from Cerulli Associates,1 tax minimization and portfolio customization are now core expectations for affluent investors, with a substantial majority saying that it’s important for their provider to help reduce their tax burden.
Likewise, advisors increasingly rank tax management among their top portfolio objectives. Rather than addressing taxes as a once-a-year exercise, leading advisors are embedding tax awareness directly into the investment process.
This shift reflects a broader recognition that after-tax returns—not pretax performance—ultimately determine wealth accumulation. The importance of tax management applies across asset classes, playing an important role in both equity and fixed income portfolios. Over time, improvements in tax efficiency can compound into meaningful differences in long-term wealth. In today’s environment, tax-aware investing is no longer optional—it’s foundational.
Systematic, rules-based approach to tax management
Effective tax management requires discipline and consistency. Markets move daily, and opportunities to defer gains or harvest losses can emerge at any time—not just during periods of broad volatility or at calendar year-end. A systematic, rules-based approach ensures that portfolio managers continuously evaluate tax implications alongside investment objectives.
At its core, disciplined tax management involves several key techniques:
• Harvesting losses to offset gains
• Selecting potentially loss-maximizing or gain-minimizing tax lots
• Holding securities long enough to qualify for favorable long-term capital gains treatment
• Avoiding wash sale2 violations
• Transitioning securities in-kind for tax efficiency, where possible
While these tools are broadly available in theory, implementing them consistently across portfolios requires integration into the processes for portfolio construction, trading and ongoing monitoring.
Consider the benefits of active tax management
Loss harvesting in fixed income
Tax management operates differently in fixed income than in equities but can be equally impactful. Tax loss harvesting should be viewed as part of disciplined tax management rather than a tactical trade. Bond price movements are largely driven by changes in interest rates and credit spreads. When interest rates rise, bond prices typically fall, creating opportunities to harvest losses. Importantly, bonds can remain aligned with a client’s intended risk profile while still providing potential tax benefits when yields move, the curve shifts or spreads reprice.
A disciplined fixed income tax management strategy seeks to realize those losses at the same time that the portfolio’s intended duration, yield, sector allocation and credit quality are maintained. When a bond is sold to capture a loss, proceeds are reinvested in a bond with similar characteristics while managing against wash sale violations. The objective is not to alter the risk profile, but to reset cost basis and generate tax assets that can potentially offset gains elsewhere in the investor’s portfolio.
Harvested losses may offset capital gains and, in certain cases, a limited amount of ordinary income, with any remaining losses carried forward. Implementation requires evaluating transaction costs, liquidity and wash sale considerations to preserve portfolio structure while executing efficiently.
Municipal bonds are particularly well-suited to this approach. When losses are realized and replacement bonds are structured appropriately, investors can lower cost basis without necessarily increasing future tax exposure—especially if bonds are held to maturity.
In periods of rising yields, this process can be especially valuable, as temporary price declines may create potential opportunities to build tax assets while maintaining tax-efficient income. Interest rate volatility doesn’t follow the calendar, so tax management in fixed income tends to be most effective when integrated into a systematic, year-round process, rather than executed only during isolated rate movements or at year-end.
Tax management in direct indexing
In equities, direct indexing provides a highly flexible structure for active tax management. Owning hundreds of individual securities expands the opportunity set for loss harvesting. When one security declines, it can be sold to realize a loss and replaced with a similar exposure to maintain market alignment. Each investor’s portfolio reflects their own cost basis and trading history. That means their tax outcomes are personalized, rather than influenced by the actions of other shareholders.
Direct indexing also enables additional tax-aware techniques that we mentioned above, from selecting specific tax lots to minimize realized gains and deferring gains by holding appreciated positions to avoiding wash sale violations and tax efficiently transitioning legacy holdings in-kind. This flexibility allows portfolios to balance the competing goals of tracking a benchmark closely while seeking to optimize after-tax outcomes.
The bottom line
A systematic, rules-based approach ensures that tax considerations are embedded into daily portfolio management, continuously evaluating potential opportunities to harvest losses, defer gains and manage transitions efficiently. Even incremental improvements in tax efficiency may compound into meaningful differences in long-term wealth. By integrating ongoing tax management into core equity and fixed income strategies, investors shift the focus from simply generating returns to maximizing after-tax wealth—where long-term success is ultimately measured.
1 Customized at Scale: A Framework for Next-Generation Advisory Platforms, October 2025. Cerulli Associates is an international research and consulting firm that provides financial institutions with guidance in strategic positioning and new business development. This study was sponsored by Parametric. Parametric is not affiliated with Cerulli Associates or any of its affiliates
2 In a wash sale, the same security sold for a loss is purchased 30 days before or after the sale. If a transaction violates the rule against wash sales, the IRS can disallow the loss deduction and add the loss to the cost basis of the repurchased security, which can effectively defer the benefit of the loss.
Parametric and Morgan Stanley do not provide legal, tax, or accounting advice or services. Clients should consult with their own tax or legal advisor prior to entering into any transaction or strategy described herein.
The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors and are current only through the date stated. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Parametric and its affiliates disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for Parametric are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Parametric strategy. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All investments are subject to the risk of loss. Prospective investors should consult with a tax or legal advisor before making any investment decision. Please refer to the Disclosure page on our website for important information about investments and risks.
02.18.2028 | RO 5231167
