A digital drawing of Two hands from separate people are putting together three giant puzzle pieces. The puzzle pieces have different images on them representing different forms of investment and currency.

Turning Obstacles into Opportunities with Rebalancing

Heather Wolf photo

Heather Wolf, CFA

Portfolio Manager

More about this author
Richard Fong photo

Richard Fong, CFA

Managing Director, Overlay Solutions

More about this author



Market volatility—and the feelings of uncertainty that follow—tend to frighten investors. Yet for investors with an overlay program, one approach to volatility is evergreen—rebalancing.



Amid the market instability around the resurgence of Middle East tensions earlier this year, Parametric was asked how our clients have approached the uncertain investment landscape. With the tool of rebalancing, volatility and market turbulence can be seen as opportunities rather than obstacles in the investment process.


At their core, rebalancing programs seek to reduce portfolio drift away from the long-term strategic asset allocation. Overweight asset classes that have outperformed can be sold at relatively high prices and underweight asset classes that have underperformed can be bought at relatively low prices—manifesting the core investment philosophy of buy low, sell high



How has rebalancing found opportunity so far in 2026?


For a rebalancing program, volatility and differential asset class performance can act as a buoy, potentially providing greater opportunities.


Take, for example, the year-to-date performance of the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI) relative to the Bloomberg US Treasury Index.



Cumulative return year to date for MSCI ACWI and Bloomberg US Treasury

Equity and Fixed 2026

Source: Bloomberg and LSEG, data from 12/31/2025 to 6/30/2026. For illustrative purposes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Indexes are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees or expenses. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments are subject to risks, including the risk of loss.


Prior to the first airstrikes in late February, the equity-bond return differential was relatively subdued, ranging from 0% to 2.5% and averaging 1.7%. That stability gave way to a reversal by late March, when the differential fell to approximately -6%. The move then swung decisively in the opposite direction, climbing nearly 18% from its trough to a peak of almost 12%.


Much commentary since 2022 has focused on how the elevated stock-bond correlation has created headwinds to the diversification1 of a traditional 60/40 portfolio. Before 2022, this correlation was largely negative, resulting in clearer rebalancing opportunities as asset classes moved in opposing ways. Since mid-2022—aside from dips into negative territory around the tariff announcements in early 2025 and again in the first quarter this year—that relationship has trended positive, potentially reducing these rebalancing opportunities.



Correlation of MSCI ACWI and Bloomberg US Treasury

10 YR Correlation

Source: Bloomberg and LSEG, data from 06/30/2017 to 07/16/2026. For illustrative purposes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Indexes are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees or expenses. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments are subject to risks, including the risk of loss.


However, for all the handwringing about positive stock-bond correlation, we still see value in rebalancing on an asset allocation basis—as long as there is disproportionate relative performance between the asset classes.


Customized overlays for institutional risk management

The bottom line


Parametric employs a variety of rebalancing approaches. Most commonly, we review asset class drift daily and rebalance based on predetermined thresholds. For example, a 60/40 portfolio might rebalance once it drifts to 58/42. 


Another approach is to establish a total portfolio tracking error budget. Through this rebalancing methodology, portfolios are monitored holistically, and the portfolio is rebalanced when the total expected tracking error exceeds a predetermined budget. 


Regardless of the approach used, Parametric believes that a rules-based systematic program is key to the successful implementation of rebalancing.




1 Diversification does not eliminate the risk of loss.


A program of regular rebalancing cannot assure a profit or protect against a loss in a declining market.


The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors and are current only through the date stated. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Parametric and its affiliates disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for Parametric are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Parametric strategy. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All investments are subject to the risk of loss. Prospective investors should consult with a tax or legal advisor before making any investment decision. Please refer to the Disclosure page on our website for important information about investments and risks.


07.30.2027 | RO 5787207